Search with stateful chat
Topics: AI Mode, Chunk Relevance, Data Mining, Gemini, LLM Readability, LLMO / GEO, Personalization, Probably in use, Query Fan Out, Semantic Search
This Google patent describes a system that enhances traditional search engines with a “generative companion” feature that maintains contextual awareness across multiple search queries. The technology creates a stateful chat experience where search responses aren’t limited to the current query but consider the user’s entire search journey, previous interactions, and contextual information. This approach helps reduce inaccuracies, prevents over/under-specified responses, and guides the user through their search session with more personalized, relevant results.
This patent could be the foundational patent for the Google AI Mode.
Your advantages:
+ Get access to the full exclusive paid articles in the blog.
+ Full analysis of hundreds of well researched active Microsoft, OpenAI and Google patents and research paper.
+ Save a lot of time and get insights in just a few minutes, without having to spend hours analyzing the documents.
+ Get quick exclusive insights about how LLMs, search engines and Google could work with easy to understand summaries and analysis.
+ All patents classified by topic for targeted research.
+ New patent summaries and analysis every week. Weekly notification via E-Mail
+ Get GEO expert knowledge for optimizing your visibility in AI Search via the GEO assistant
+ Use all AI Research Tools to gain insights in seconds from all documents in the patent database, Google Leaks and DOJ trials via the Patent & Paper Analyzer and Google Leak Analyzer
+ Gain fundamental insights for your SEO and GEO work and become a real thought leader.
Get access to the GEO Research Suite and become a thought leader now!
Vincent zu Dohna
27.05.2025, 11:41 Uhr
Thank you Olaf, very helpful summary and interpretation!
Vincent zu Dohna
27.05.2025, 11:52 Uhr
Do you think trust links will heighten the perceived reliability of a statement compared to stating the source and evidence directly in the content explicitly (e.g. study details that substantiate the claim)? Obviously both options are better than just stating claims. Wonder if this really is a something that should be done or if it’s just a capability that is there if needed.
Olaf Kopp
28.05.2025, 21:51 Uhr
I would not expect this. It is mor about Chunk Relevance I would say. Backlinks help to be treated as a reiable source. Choosing the chunk or passage is more relevance orientated